The Doctrine of Pre, Mid, and Post Tribulation Rapture. Which is acceptable based on the scripture?

The doctrine of the rapture, the event where believers in Christ are taken up to meet Him in the air, has been a subject of considerable debate among Christians. The timing of the rapture in relation to the tribulation—a seven-year period of unparalleled suffering described in Revelation—has led to three main views: pretribulation rapture, mid-tribulation rapture, and post-tribulation rapture. While each perspective has scriptural support, this article examines these views and argues that the pretribulation rapture is the most biblically consistent position.

1. Pretribulation Rapture

The pretribulation rapture asserts that believers will be taken up before the tribulation begins. This view emphasizes God’s promise to deliver His people from the coming wrath.

Scriptural Basis:

  1. 1 Thessalonians 4:16-17: “For the Lord Himself will descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of an archangel, and with the trumpet of God. And the dead in Christ will rise first. Then we who are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds to meet the Lord in the air.”
    • This passage describes a sudden, supernatural event, suggesting that the rapture is distinct from Christ’s second coming.
  2. 1 Thessalonians 1:10: “And to wait for His Son from heaven, whom He raised from the dead—Jesus, who rescues us from the coming wrath.”
    • The “coming wrath” refers to the tribulation, implying that believers will be spared from this period.
  3. Revelation 3:10: “Because you have kept My command to endure patiently, I will also keep you from the hour of trial that is going to come on the whole world to test the inhabitants of the earth.”
    • This promise to the church at Philadelphia supports the idea that faithful believers will be removed before the tribulation.
  4. John 14:2-3: Jesus’ promise to prepare a place for believers and return to take them to be with Him suggests an event distinct from His return to judge the earth.

Theological Implications:

  • God’s nature as a loving and protective Father aligns with the pretribulation rapture, as He spares His children from His wrath (Romans 5:9).
  • The distinction between the church and Israel supports this view. The tribulation is described as “Jacob’s trouble” (Jeremiah 30:7), focusing on Israel rather than the church.

2. Mid-Tribulation Rapture

The mid-tribulation rapture view posits that believers will be raptured at the midpoint of the tribulation, before the great outpouring of God’s wrath.

Scriptural Basis:

  1. Revelation 11:15: The seventh trumpet is interpreted by some as the rapture.
  2. Daniel 9:27: The midpoint of the tribulation is marked by the abomination of desolation, which mid-tribulationists see as a possible timing for the rapture.

Challenges:

  • This view conflates the trumpets of Revelation with the trumpet in 1 Corinthians 15:52. However, these trumpets are distinct in purpose and context.
  • It does not adequately address promises of being spared from “wrath” (1 Thessalonians 1:10).

3. Post-Tribulation Rapture

The post-tribulation rapture teaches that believers will endure the tribulation and be raptured at the second coming of Christ.

Scriptural Basis:

  1. Matthew 24:29-31: “Immediately after the distress of those days… He will send His angels with a loud trumpet call, and they will gather His elect.”
  2. Revelation 20:4-5: Post-tribulationists argue this describes the resurrection of believers after the tribulation.

Challenges:

  • This view does not explain how believers are spared from God’s wrath during the tribulation.
  • It creates a logistical issue: believers meet Christ in the air only to immediately return with Him, conflating the rapture and the second coming.
  • The emphasis on imminence in passages like Matthew 24:44 and 1 Thessalonians 5:2 is undermined, as the tribulation must precede the rapture.

Pretribulation Rapture is the Acceptable View

  1. Imminence of Christ’s Return:
    • Numerous passages describe Christ’s return as imminent (Matthew 24:44, Titus 2:13). The pretribulation view best preserves this sense of expectancy, as no specific events must occur before the rapture.
  2. God’s Wrath vs. Satan’s Persecution:
    • The tribulation is marked by God’s judgment on the earth (Revelation 6-18). While believers may endure persecution from Satan, they are not destined to suffer God’s wrath (1 Thessalonians 5:9).
  3. Distinct Events:
    • The rapture and second coming are described differently in Scripture. The rapture involves believers meeting Christ in the air (1 Thessalonians 4:17), while the second coming sees Christ returning to the earth with His saints (Revelation 19:14).
  4. The Church’s Absence in Revelation:
    • The church is not mentioned in Revelation chapters 6-18, which describe the tribulation. This absence supports the idea that the church is removed before this period.

Conclusion

While mid-tribulation and post-tribulation views offer valuable insights, the pretribulation rapture aligns most consistently with Scripture. It preserves the imminence of Christ’s return, respects God’s promises to spare His people from wrath, and distinguishes between the rapture and second coming. This view offers hope and encouragement to believers, affirming that Jesus will return to take His church before the tribulation begins, as He promised in John 14:2-3. Believers can find comfort in the assurance that they will not face the judgment meant for a rebellious world but will instead be with the Lord forever (1 Thessalonians 4:18).


Comments

Leave a comment